Sumit Gupta emphasizes the necessity of balanced legislation by providing insights on India’s approach to CBDCs and private cryptocurrencies.
The regulatory stance of India regarding cryptocurrencies and central bank digital currencies continues to spark debate, with recent discussions indicating that “central bank digital currencies” (CBDCs) may have an advantage over “private cryptocurrencies.”
Sumit Gupta, the co-founder and CEO of CoinDCX, argued in an Oct. 23 X post that CBDCs and cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin serve distinct purposes and “should not be regarded as competitors.”
His post elicited responses from the crypto community, with some cautioning that CBDCs could resemble “digital fiat,” potentially posing the same inflationary risks as traditional currencies.
Striking a balance between security and innovation will likely influence India’s role in the global digital economy as it molds its approach to crypto regulation.
Gupta stated in an interview with Cointelegraph that he is of the opinion that both CBDCs and cryptocurrencies are valuable, but they fulfill distinct functions: “The nation’s central bank issues CBDCs, guaranteeing full control over their issuance, supply, and use.”
Gupta further by saying, “this centralization facilitates efficient execution of monetary policy, allowing for better control of inflation, liquidity and interest rates.”
Nevertheless, there are persistent skeptics. Jack Booth, co-founder of TON Society, stated in a recent interview with Cointelegraph that “CBDCs pose the greatest peril to self-sovereignty.” He also noted that public trust in governments is at historic lows.
“The level of public trust in governments, particularly in Western countries, is at its lowest point in history. The implementation of CBDCs, which would grant unelected officials complete control over your funds, would exacerbate the existing issues that inspired and stimulated the development of Bitcoin many years ago.”
However, Gupta expressed his conviction that India is amenable to fintech innovation, despite the ongoing debate regarding the prohibition of private cryptocurrencies.
“According to numerous Web3 reports, the implementation of a ban could impede the advancement of blockchain technology and suppress the entrepreneurial spirit in India, which is home to over 450 Web3 enterprises and over 75,000 essential Web3 talents.”
Gupta emphasized that India’s regulatory framework has facilitated the compliance of crypto exchanges with the guidelines and tax frameworks of the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU).
This transition was evident in March, when the Supreme Court of India invalidated the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) prohibition on banks’ interactions with crypto-related organizations.
Also Read: FTX Resolves Legal Conflict with Bybit for $228 Million
Wallets