RBI and India’s Securities Commissioner Engage in Crypto Regulations Battle

The RBI and the Securities and Exchange Board of India have differing views on how to regulate cryptocurrencies.

Government committees in India are hearing opposing opinions on the regulation of cryptocurrencies from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). The continuing disagreements show how difficult it is to get a consensus on how to handle the cryptocurrency market, a hotly debated topic in the country’s regulatory and financial communities.

Reportedly signaling a shift towards more open regulatory attitudes, the SEBI has reportedly taken the initiative by proposing that several authorities should regulate the cryptocurrency sector.

Documents pertaining to SEBI’s plan to have numerous regulatory agencies monitor bitcoin transactions have recently emerged. This suggestion shows that some Indian authorities are ready to accept the complexity of cryptocurrency, which is a significant change from their earlier more cautious attitudes.

SEBI’s proposal entails the delegation of regulatory authority over distinct facets of the cryptocurrency market to various entities. For example, the IRDAI may have jurisdiction over insurance assets and the PFRDA over pension funds.

Along with its normal supervision, SEBI may one day follow the US model and regulate ICOs and other cryptocurrencies that are deemed securities. This strategy would include the issuance of licenses for crypto industry equities market-related products with the goal of integrating these assets into the conventional financial system under appropriate supervision.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) takes a cautious stance on private cryptocurrencies and persists in its drive for a total prohibition on stablecoins, in stark contrast to SEBI’s openness. In the eyes of the central bank, they represent a threat to the economy as a whole since they may cause problems like tax avoidance and the diluting of private wealth.

The RBI warned of the risks to fiscal stability posed by decentralized, peer-to-peer networks that rely on voluntary compliance, according to an individual familiar with the panel’s deliberations.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has taken a hard stance on cryptocurrencies since 2018 when it outright forbade banks from doing business with cryptocurrency exchanges and users; the Supreme Court subsequently reversed this ruling. In light of the court’s decision, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has urged financial institutions to mitigate cryptocurrency-related risks by rigorously following anti-money-laundering and foreign exchange regulations.

Disputes between SEBI’s liberal ideas and RBI’s conservative stances on cryptocurrency regulation have been building up to this point in Indian history, and the government panel charged with making a definitive decision is drawing near to completing its report.

How to effectively control cryptocurrency is a worldwide dilemma, and the continuing argument reflects that. India acknowledged the worldwide ramifications and the need for a coordinated strategy to cryptocurrency regulation when it sought a worldwide framework to control such assets during its G20 chairmanship last year.

Also Read: Mike Novogratz Claims Bitcoin Will Not Reach a New High Until This Happens