Poland is adopting an alternative approach to the integration of Bitcoin into its national reserves, as countries such as the United States, Germany, and the Czech Republic investigate the possibility.
Summary
Poland‘s National Bank President, Adam Glapiński, has rejected the integration of Bitcoin into its national reserves due to security concerns. He believes Bitcoin is unstable and dangerous. Despite this, Poland’s reserves have increased by 22.1%, reaching EUR 214.19 billion. The country’s cryptocurrency policy may change post-presidential elections, with other nations like the US, Germany, and the Czech Republic also considering Bitcoin as a potential reserve asset.
Adam Glapiński, the President of NBP, is not censoring his words. He is of the opinion that Bitcoin is an asset that is far too unstable and dangerous to be considered reliable.
However, as the global interest in Bitcoin continues to increase, is it possible that Poland’s decision will remain viable in the long term?
Poland’s Central Bank Rejects Bitcoin
Adam Glapiński, President of the National Bank of Poland, stated at a recent press conference that Bitcoin will not be incorporated into Poland’s financial strategy. He emphasized that the country’s reserves must be “completely secure,” and Bitcoin does not satisfy this requirement.
Glapiński declared, “We will not contemplate Bitcoin under any circumstances.” “Bitcoin is not a secure, stable, or permanent reserve.”
However, Poland will persist in maintaining financial stability by maintaining traditional assets such as gold, U.S. dollars, and euros.
Poland’s reserves are expanding regardless of Bitcoin. According to NBP data, the country’s reserve assets have increased by 22.1% from the previous year, reaching EUR 214.19 billion. This increase is indicative of Poland’s prudent financial management strategy in a global economy that is unpredictable.
Poland’s position on Bitcoin may evolve subsequent to the forthcoming presidential election, regardless of the NBP’s vehement opposition. Despite the fact that the NBP is opposed to Bitcoin, the country’s position may change following the presidential elections in May 2025.
Sławomir Mentzen, one of the candidates, has expressed his firm endorsement of cryptocurrencies. He aspires to establish Poland as a “cryptocurrency haven,” and if elected, his administration could advocate for a distinct approach to digital assets.
Other nations are in disagreement
Poland is not the sole nation to refuse Bitcoin as a reserve asset. Christine Lagarde, President of the European Central Bank (ECB), has also rejected the notion, contending that reserves must be liquid, secure, and free from dangers associated with illicit activities. In her opinion, Bitcoin does not satisfy these criteria.
Nevertheless, other nations are proceeding in the opposite direction. Germany, the Czech Republic, and Hong Kong are investigating Bitcoin as a potential asset for their reserves. Bhutan maintains Bitcoin as part of its national reserves, and El Salvador has already declared it legal tender.
The U.S. adopts an alternative strategy
The United States is demonstrating a greater interest in Bitcoin reserves, whereas Poland and the ECB remain skeptical. Several states have proposed a Bitcoin Reserve Fund, and former President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order to establish a national digital assets stockpile, indicating a distinct division in global crypto policies.
Also Read: Fednow Adds Ripple’s RLUSD to Facilitate Faster Payments
Wallets