The crypto industry is currently experiencing heightened regulatory uncertainty, and the most recent controversy has brought Ethereum (ETH) to the forefront of those discussions.
In a recent letter to SEC Chair Gary Gensler and FINRA CEO Robert Cook, Republican legislators have raised concerns regarding Prometheum Capital’s custody services for ETH. Prometheum has classified ETH as a security, despite the SEC’s previous suggestion that it is not. This classification has resulted in a significant amount of confusion.
Prometheum introduced custody services for ETH in May 2024, referring to it as a “crypto asset security.” This audacious assertion is in direct opposition to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) authorization of Ethereum exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which excluded ETH from the definition of a security. According to lawmakers, this contradiction is indicative of more profound regulatory deficiencies.
Prometheum’s capacity to provide these services appears to be a result of the SEC’s ambiguous guidelines for Special Purpose Broker-Dealers (SPBDs), which further exacerbates the confusion. SPBDs are restricted to the management of securities, as stipulated by the regulations. Prometheum effectively polluted the waters by publicly designating ETH a security. Critics contend that this poses a threat to innovation and may leave investors uncertain about how to navigate the market.
Representative John Rose, along with Republican legislators French Hill, Mike Flood, Dusty Johnson, and William Timmons, is the primary signatory of the letter. It accuses Gensler’s stewardship of fostering “chaos and disarray” in the digital assets sector. John Rose succinctly stated, “Players in the digital assets space deserve certainty.”
Journalist Eleanor Terrett contributed to the spectacle by providing her perspective on the SEC’s leadership transitions. According to Charles Gasparino, Dan Gallagher, who was considered a potential replacement for Gensler during the Trump administration, has privately acknowledged that he is unlikely to accept the position. However, this could be subject to change based on political developments. Matthew Stebbins is another individual who is believed to have maintained a close relationship with former SEC Chair Jay Clayton. There are rumors that Clayton has been advocating for Stebbins’ nomination.
In the interim, there is an increasing amount of speculative activity regarding Gensler’s future. Some individuals are of the opinion that he may resign by January 2025 due to the increasing criticism. Names such as Dan Gallagher, Brad Bondi, and Paul Atkins—all of whom are recognized for their pro-crypto opinions—are being considered as potential successors in the event that he steps down. It is probable that Gary will resign in the vicinity of January 20, 2025, when Trump will celebrate his inauguration.
This letter is not merely a request for responses; it is a component of a more comprehensive initiative to reorient crypto regulation in a manner that is more conducive to innovation. Even the Trump administration is advocating for the transfer of oversight from the SEC to the CFTC. Such a change could result in more transparent regulations for projects such as Ethereum; however, it would necessitate substantial funding and political willpower to bring about.
The market is currently in a state of anticipation. The regulatory status of Ethereum remains uncertain, and Prometheum’s actions have raised urgent concerns. One thing is certain: the crypto world is in dire need of clarity, and the stakes are at an all-time high, regardless of whether Gensler remains or departs.
Also Read: Hong Kong Issues Warning to Crypto Firms Regarding Usage of the “Bank” Label
Wallets