The South Korean regulator is uncertain about the potential of corporate cryptocurrency investments

Kim Byung-hwan, who is expected to assume the role of the new FSC Chairman, expressed worries regarding corporate crypto investments during a National Assembly hearing.

During a confirmation hearing at the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee on July 22nd, Kim Byung-hwan, the potential new chief of South Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC), expressed apprehension regarding corporate investments in cryptocurrency. It is anticipated that Kim will succeed Lee Hyun as chairman this summer.

Kim also underscored the significance of policies that prioritize investor protection over market expansion. He expressed skepticism regarding the potential for institutional and corporate investment in cryptocurrency exchanges. Consequently, as Kim previously stated, it is necessary to exercise specific precautions in light of the previous market confusion.

Kim stated that the current policies should prioritize investor protection over market development. The perspective he provided on the subject was characterized as quite conservative in terms of the function of corporations in cryptocurrency.

Kim also aimed to refute the idea that cryptocurrencies can entirely replace traditional currency. He asserted that exclusive virtual assets issued by the private sector could partially replace the legal tender of the central bank. This method is consistent with other regulatory concerns concerning the dependability and stability of cryptocurrencies.

Kim concurs with the conventional perspective on financial products. He underscored the fact that virtual assets are not comparable to any other financial instruments. This signifies a distinction in the regulatory approach to cryptocurrencies in comparison to traditional financial assets.

Kim was fairly cautious regarding the sanctioning of spot Bitcoin ETFs. His recommendation was to monitor the consequences of comparable measures implemented in the United States. This method prioritizes the stability previously mentioned and meticulously evaluates the precedents of international law.

lawmakers had requested the authorization of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs). However, Kim emphasized that the matter required a more nuanced method of management. He stated that the government must evaluate the impact of financial sector volatility on financial organizations.

Kim’s responses to the parliamentarians demonstrated his dedication to prioritizing economic stability. Additionally, he underscored the necessity of additional discussions regarding the regulation of virtual assets. Al’s approach is more circumspect, which is consistent with the general regulatory transition in South Korea.

Politicians have urged regulatory authorities to adhere to Washington’s approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs. However, regulators continue to exercise caution. Kim’s statements suggest that he prefers to observe and anticipate international trends prior to taking action.

However, Kim’s testimony underscored the legislative and supervision duality that exists between the legislative sphere and the financial sector. Kim and other regulators prioritize sustainability and investor protection, while politicians, particularly in the region, advocate for accelerated market expansion. This emphasizes the intricate balance between the innovative and the controlled that is so defining of the cryptosphere.

The approach of Kim is indicative of the prevailing sentiment among regulators worldwide. Governments worldwide are grappling with the issue of how to integrate cryptocurrency into traditional financial systems. This is evident in Kim’s methodology, which demonstrates a careful and logical perspective on market regulation.

Also Read: Europol finds Bitcoin and Altcoin crimes equally prevalent